Skip to main content

aaa-0215.html

Matthews Gleaves vs John Finley, March 1794, Augusta County, Drawer 449

 

Augusta County to wit

Matthew Gleave complains of John Finley in custody(?) ?? of a plea of Convenant

broken for whereas by a certain Indenture made at the parish & County of Augusta

on the 24th day of January in the year 1775 between the plaintiff by the name of

Matthew Gleaves & by the consent of his Guardian who was William Gleave (the

plaintiff being then an infant]) of the Colony of Virginia & County aforesaid of

the one part & deft by the name John Finley Wheelright of the County & Colony

aforesaid which written covenant signed and sealed by the said deft the plaintiff

brings here into court the dates whereof in the same day & year ??? said ???

thereby witnessed that the plaintiff by his consent & that of his Guardian

aforesaid had put and bound himself apprentice to John Finley the deft to learn

his art trade & Mystery of a Wheelright & Cooper and after the manner of an

apprentice to serve from ye date of sd indenture for & during the Term of four

years ensuing the date during which time he was faithfully to obey the lawfull

commands of the said deft & in all respects to demean himself as a faithfull

apprentice ought to do during the said term & by the Indenture aforesaid the

defendant on his part covenanted with ye ??? to use the utmost of his endeavours

to Teach or cause to be taught or Instructed the said apprentice in the trade of

Mystery he then professed (that is to say meaning the arts of a Wheelright &

Cooper) and procure or provide for the deft sufficient meat drink washing lodging

and apparel sufficient for an apprentice during said term & like wise at the

Expiration of said Term the said Deft was to provide for the plaintiff a sett of

Tools fit to carry on the business & employment aforesaid by Virtue of which

covenant the plaintiff became an apprentice unto ye Deft for & during ye term

aforesaid as he ought to do & the said plaintiff in fact saith that the Deft did

not teach or cause him to be taught in the period aforesaid the arts of a

Wheelright or Cooper nor did he at the expiration of the four years above

mentioned furnish him with a set of tools suitable for each trade according to

the form and effect of his agreement in his behalf made therefore the plaintiff

says that the defendant altho often requested his agreement aforesaid in form

aforesaid made to the Deft did not perform but broke & the same to him hitherto

to perform the Deft hath refused & still doth refuse wherefore he saith he is

prejudiced & hath damage to the value of two hundred pounds & therefore he brings

suit.

 

????????

pledges of prosecution Stuart pg

 

c:\docs\virginia\gleaves.txt

aaa0215